Re: Claiming Items

>
> Hi!
>
> I myself read into the sources of version 6.2.1 all over february.
>
> I did not learn it by heart, but I feel ready to start implementing
> something now.
>
> I would like to start with the HAVING-clause and when this works I want
> to continue with the other missing items (UNION, INTERSECT, MINUS,... (maybe
> something of this is already implemented??))
>
> Could you please tell me, if this is all right for you?

Yep.  HAVING is what I was hoping you could add, and OUTER.  UNION and
subselects were added for 6.3.  Added to TODO list.

--
Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)