>
> Hi!
>
> I myself read into the sources of version 6.2.1 all over february.
>
> I did not learn it by heart, but I feel ready to start implementing
> something now.
>
> I would like to start with the HAVING-clause and when this works I want
> to continue with the other missing items (UNION, INTERSECT, MINUS,... (maybe
> something of this is already implemented??))
>
> Could you please tell me, if this is all right for you?
Yep. HAVING is what I was hoping you could add, and OUTER. UNION and
subselects were added for 6.3. Added to TODO list.
--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)