>
> Andreas wrote:
> >
> > >> the table or even discover that it exists!
> > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > > Not in 6.3, or maybe ever. Too much OO stuff for that, I think.
> >
> > I vote for not ever. No commercial DBMS has it. It is a standard
> > that is of very restricted practicability. You can always split into
> > different
> > databases whatever needs turbo security.
>
> I'm not quite sure if any commercial RDMBS does it. But since
> we don't have the ability to create multiple tables/views of
> the same name as long as the owner differs, I think it's
> better to stay as we are. As long as PostgreSQL cannot
> distinguish tables of the same name by a <user>.tablename
> syntax, it's better to let them know what tables already
> exist.
I have NOT added this to the TODO list.
--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)