> Actually, I'm not married to db_* for views...it was a "quick fix"
> to ensure that things still worked. Whatever we decide on, both Julie and
> Peter, at a minimum, need to know relatively soon. I know in Julie's
> case, she does do a call to pg_user...I let her know tonight that she
> needs to change it to db_user, for the *current* code...
Good. I didn't want the db_ namespace pollution. I will call it
pg_user_no_passwd, and make it a view, not a rule. Is that OK with
everyone?
Are the only things you changed psql.c and initdb.sh?
--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)