Re: [HACKERS] Here it is - view permissions

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Here it is - view permissions
Дата
Msg-id 199802232235.RAA08178@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Here it is - view permissions  ("Oliver Elphick" <olly@lfix.co.uk>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Here it is - view permissions
Список pgsql-hackers
 >
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>   >All tables are created with default permissions for SELECT to PUBLIC, so
>   >views are no different.
>
> Is this not contrary to the SQL standard?  I understood that SQL tables
> are created with permissions for their creator only; any permissions for
> other users must be granted explicitly.  According to "SQL The Standard
> Handbook" (Cannan & Otten, 1993), the owner of the schema in which a table
> is created is given a full set of privileges, and no other user can access

Will be the default in 6.3, I think.

> the table or even discover that it exists!
               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Not in 6.3, or maybe ever.  Too much OO stuff for that, I think.

>
> It certainly seems undesirable to give automatic access to data of unknown
> sensitivity.  Surely the default permission should be for the table's
> creator alone or for the owner of the PostgreSQL database (which I suppose
> is equivalent to the `schema').
>
> I see that Jan Wieck has posted a method for preventing world readability;
> perhaps this should just be flagged as a configurable option.


--
Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Keith Parks
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] SIGSEGV in sebselect.
Следующее
От: Brett McCormick
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Here it is - view permissions