>
> I had forgotten about your mention of this. I am running some tests
> now, and things look promising. However, if we go to 64k or 128k
> tuples, we would be in trouble. (We can do 64k tuples by changing the
> 'special variable' length value from -1 to 0.
>
I am not going to make any changes to the variable length overhead for
char(), varchar(), and text at this time. It is too close to beta. I
will keep the item on the TODO list, and we can hash it out later.
--
Bruce Momjian
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us