Re: consttraints.source

>
> Hi,
>
> I'm seeing similar problems, mainly due to failure to sort correctly
> even though there is an "order by" clause.
>
> I did a few tests and found that the sort sort seemed to fail when there
> were multiple columns in the "order by" clause. (Not conclusive)

This is a huge help.  I think I have found it.  I just overhauled the
readfunc/outfunc code, so it was now very clear that was in the
Query.sortClause.

Your hint that the it fails when there is more than one sort identifier
was the trick.

>
> I don't know when it 1st appeared as I've been trying to compile on
> SPARC-Linux for the past few attempts and this is the 1st time I've
> had a fully working package to run the regression tests on!!
>
> Thanks,
> Keith.
>
>
> Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
> > emkxp01@mtcc.demon.co.uk
> > >
> > > Bruce,
> > >
> > > Just running the regression tests on the latest CVS on SPARC-Linux!!
> > >
> > > Appart from several other ordering and precision errors I'm seeing
> > > errors in constraints tests due to output/constraints.source not
> > > being updated for the new error messages.
> >
> > I have just fixed many of these WARN problems.  I am looking at the new
> > results.  The first problem:
> >
> >     ======   boolean   ======
> >     166,168d165
> >     <           |f |f
> >     <           |f |f
> >     <           |f |f
> >     170a168
> >     >           |f |f
> >     173a172
> >     >           |f |f
> >     176a176
> >     >           |f |f
> >
> > is because the query has no ORDER BY.
> >
> > The second problem looks serious:
> >
> > QUERY: SET geqo TO 'off';
> > QUERY: SELECT '' AS thirtysix, p1.f1 AS point1, p2.f1 AS point2, p1.f1<->
> p2.f$
> >    FROM POINT_TBL p1, POINT_TBL p2
> >    ORDER BY dist, point1 using <<, point2 using <<;
> > thirtysix|point1    |point2    |            dist
> > ---------+----------+----------+----------------
> >          |(10,10)   |(-10,0)   |22.3606797749979
> >          |(0,0)     |(-10,0)   |              10
> >
> > The 'dist' is not being ordered.
> >
> > In geometry we have:
> >
> > 104c103
> >     <       |(0,0)     |[(0,0),(6,6)]                |(-0,0)
> >     ---
> >     >       |(0,0)     |[(0,0),(6,6)]                |(0,0)
> >
> > I am happy to see the -0 changed to zero, but this may be just on my
> > platform.  Also:
> >
> >     <           |(-0,0),(-20,-20)
> >     ---
> >     >           |(0,0),(-20,-20)
> >     213c212
> >     <           |(-0,2),(-14,0)
> >     ---
> >     >           |(0,2),(-14,0)
> >     221c220
> >     <           |(14,-0),(0,-34)
> >     ---
> >     >           |(14,0),(0,-34)
> >     236c235
> >
> > We also have broken sorting in timespan:
> >
> > QUERY: SELECT '' AS fortyfive, r1.*, r2.*
> >    FROM TIMESPAN_TBL r1, TIMESPAN_TBL r2
> >    WHERE r1.f1 > r2.f1
> >    ORDER BY r1.f1, r2.f1;
> > fortyfive|f1                           |f1
> > ---------+-----------------------------+-----------------------------
> >          |@ 6 years                    |@ 14 secs ago
> >          |@ 5 mons                     |@ 14 secs ago
> >          |@ 5 mons 12 hours            |@ 14 secs ago
> >
> > How long has this been broken?  Any idea on a cause.  Obviously it is a
> > sorting issue, but where?
> >
> > --
> > Bruce Momjian maillist@candle.pha.pa.us
> >
>
>


--
Bruce Momjian
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us