Re: Updating psql for features of new FE/BE protocol

Kevin Brown <kevin@sysexperts.com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Also, I would like to provide the same set of options w.r.t. messages
>> logged in the server log.  Here there is an additional frammish that
>> could be imagined, ie, more detail for more-serious errors.  Any
>> opinions about what it should look like?

> Not sure exactly what you're asking for here.  If you're asking what
> additional detail should be included for more serious errors,

No, I was asking whether anyone thought such behavior should be
user-controllable, and if so exactly how the controlling GUC variables
should be defined.

One way I could imagine doing it is to split log_min_messages into
three variables, along the lines of "minimum message level to produce
a TERSE report", "minimum message level to produce a DEFAULT report",
and "minimum message level to produce a VERBOSE report".  This seems
a bit inelegant though.  Better ideas anyone?
        regards, tom lane