Re: Pl/Python -- current maintainer?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Pl/Python -- current maintainer?
Дата
Msg-id 19913.1140977332@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Pl/Python -- current maintainer?  (James William Pye <pgsql@jwp.name>)
Ответы Re: Pl/Python -- current maintainer?  (James William Pye <pgsql@jwp.name>)
Список pgsql-hackers
James William Pye <pgsql@jwp.name> writes:
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 06:36:19PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> I'm not sure it's an issue now that we have pg_pltemplate, but in older
>> versions it's possible to create a language without setting a validator.
>> This would make the validator an unsuitable place for checking the
>> restrictions.

> Hrm. I think this would only be an issue in PL/Py is if the user had the ability
> to alter probin. The handler will never directly execute code in prosrc; it
> relies on a validator to fill in probin.

That design is broken on its face, as the system does not guarantee to
call the validator.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: constraints and sql92 information_schema compliance
Следующее
От: James William Pye
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Pl/Python -- current maintainer?