Re: Degression (PG10 > 11, 12 or 13)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Tom Lane
Тема
Re: Degression (PG10 > 11, 12 or 13)
Дата
в 16:24:54
Msg-id
1990049.1622219094@sss.pgh.pa.us
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Degression (PG10 > 11, 12 or 13) Johannes Graën <johannes@selfnet.de>
Re: Degression (PG10 > 11, 12 or 13) Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Re: Degression (PG10 > 11, 12 or 13) Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Degression (PG10 > 11, 12 or 13) Johannes Graën <johannes@selfnet.de>
Re: Degression (PG10 > 11, 12 or 13) Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>
Pavel Stehule  writes:
> pá 28. 5. 2021 v 16:12 odesílatel Johannes Graën 
> napsal:
>> When trying to upgrade an existing database from version 10 to 13 I came
>> across a degression in some existing code used by clients. Further
>> investigations showed that performance measures are similar in versions
>> 11 to 13, while in the original database on version 10 it's around 100
>> times faster. I could boil it down to perl functions used for sorting.

> Are you sure, so all databases use the same encoding and same locale?

Yeah ... I don't know too much about the performance of Perl regexps,
but it'd be plausible that it varies depending on locale setting.

			regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Tomas Vondra
Дата:
От: Justin Pryzby
Дата:
FAQ