Re: [HACKERS] bgwriter_lru_multiplier blurbs inconsistent

Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com> writes:
> On Sun, 20 Jan 2008, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think the main problem is the qualifying clause up front in a place
>> of prominence.  Here's a V3 try

> That one looks good to me.  These are small details but better to get it
> right now.

OK, committed.  Back to Alvaro's original concern: is the short
description in guc.c all right, or can we improve that?

            regards, tom lane