Re: DROP DATABASE vs patch to not remove files right away

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: DROP DATABASE vs patch to not remove files right away
Дата
Msg-id 19873.1208309267@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: DROP DATABASE vs patch to not remove files right away  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Ответы Re: DROP DATABASE vs patch to not remove files right away  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think that it should be coded
>> to ignore ENOENT the same as the bgwriter does, and that it should press
>> on and keep trying to delete things even if it gets a failure.

> Perhaps, if it gets ENOENT, record this fact -- and after rmtree
> returns, retry the whole thing.

Er, retry what?  There was, presumably, nothing to delete.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Improving planner variable handling
Следующее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: DROP DATABASE vs patch to not remove files right away