Re: pg_migrator progress

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: pg_migrator progress
Дата
Msg-id 19715.1238262677@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pg_migrator progress  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Ответы Re: pg_migrator progress
Список pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> But having said that, there isn't any real harm in fixing the OID
>> counter to match what it was.  You need to run pg_resetxlog to set the
>> WAL position and XID counter anyway, and it can set the OID counter too.

> FYI, I decided against restoring the oid counter because it might
> collide with an oid assigned during pg_migrator schema creation.

That argument seems pretty empty --- why is it more likely than a
collision happening if you *don't* restore the oid counter?  And why
would it matter anyway?  We fixed the problems with oid collisions
some time ago.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Temporarily (I hope) disable flattening of IN/EXISTS sublinks
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: tuplestore API problem