Re: Minor correction in alter_table.sgml
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Minor correction in alter_table.sgml |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 19669.1480522630@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Minor correction in alter_table.sgml (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Minor correction in alter_table.sgml
Re: [HACKERS] Minor correction in alter_table.sgml |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
> Seems like this would be a bit better:
> ------
> All the actions, when acting on a single table and not using the ALL IN
> TABLESPACE form, except RENAME and SET SCHEMA, can be combined into a
> list of multiple alterations to be applied.
> ------
> I note that we say 'in parallel', but given that we have actual parallel
> operations now, we should probably shy away from using that except in
> cases where we actually mean operations utilizing multiple parallel
> processes.
I follow your beef with use of the word "parallel", but your proposed
rewording loses the entire point of multiple actions per ALTER TABLE;
namely that they're accomplished without repeated scans of the table.
Also the above seems a bit clunky; doesn't ALL IN TABLESPACE fall outside
the restriction "acting on a single table"?
So maybe something like
All the forms of ALTER TABLE that act on a single table,except RENAME and SET SCHEMA, can be combined into alist of
multiplealterations to be applied together.
We would have to enlarge on what "together" means, but I think there may
already be text explaining that further down.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: