Re: Timestamp conversion can't use index

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Tom Lane
Тема
Re: Timestamp conversion can't use index
Дата
Msg-id
19662.1009381749@sss.pgh.pa.us
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Re: Timestamp conversion can't use index Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@fourpalms.org>
Re: Timestamp conversion can't use index Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: Timestamp conversion can't use index Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Timestamp conversion can't use index Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: Timestamp conversion can't use index Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Timestamp conversion can't use index Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Bruce Momjian  writes:
> What has me confused is why constant folding is needed to perform index
> lookups.

You are confused because those aren't related.

The entire notion of an indexscan is predicated on the assumption that
you are comparing all elements of the index to the same comparison
value.  Thus for example "x = random()" is not indexable.  To use an
indexscan the query planner must be able to determine that the right
hand side will not change over the course of the scan.

Constant-folding requires a stronger assumption: that the result the
function gives when evaluated by the query planner will be the same
result we'd get later (perhaps much later) at execution time.

Since we only have one kind of noncachable function at the moment,
these two restrictions are conflated ... but there should be more than
one kind of noncachable function.
		regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)
Дата:
От: Thomas Lockhart
Дата:
FAQ