Re: Why doesn't src/backend/port/win32/socket.c implement bind()?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Why doesn't src/backend/port/win32/socket.c implement bind()? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 19658.1460554394@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Why doesn't src/backend/port/win32/socket.c implement bind()? (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Why doesn't src/backend/port/win32/socket.c implement bind()?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 9:06 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> If there's other stuff using high ports on a particular buildfarm machine,
>> you'd expect occasional random test failures due to this. The observed
>> fact that some buildfarm critters are much more prone to this type of
>> failure than others is well explained by this hypothesis.
> Each test run uses its own custom unix_socket_directories, PGHOST is
> enforced to use it, and all the port tests go through that as well.
By that argument, we don't need the free-port-searching code on Unix at
all. But this discussion is mostly about Windows machines.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: