Re: We really ought to do something about O_DIRECT and data=journalled on ext4

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: We really ought to do something about O_DIRECT and data=journalled on ext4
Дата
Msg-id 19633.1291229589@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: We really ought to do something about O_DIRECT and data=journalled on ext4  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Ответы Re: We really ought to do something about O_DIRECT and data=journalled on ext4  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> It might be nice to add new sync_method options, "osync_odirect" and
> "odatasync_odirect" for DBAs who think they know enough to tune with
> non-defaults.

That would have the benefit that we'd not have to argue with people
who liked the current behavior (assuming there are any).  I'm not
sure there's much technical advantage, but from a political standpoint
it might be the easiest sort of change to push through.

However, this doesn't really address the question of what a sensible
choice of default is.  If there's little evidence about whether the
current flavor of open_datasync is really the fastest way, there's
none whatsoever that establishes open_datasync_without_o_direct
being a sane choice of default.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Heikki Linnakangas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Hot Standby: too many KnownAssignedXids
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Improved JDBC driver part 2