Re: that picksplit debug message again

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Is the %d actually in the right place here?
> errmsg("picksplit method for %d column of index \"%s\" failed",
>         attno + 1, RelationGetRelationName(r))

No, any native speaker of English would say "for column %d".  Putting
"failed" at the end seems a bit awkward as well, though I can't offhand
see a better phrasing.  "picksplit method failed for ..." is *not*
better; it implies there is only one picksplit method for everything,
whereas the point of the message is that the one associated with this
column failed.

> And later in the file there is this, which might have the same problem:
> elog(LOG, "PickSplit method of %d columns of index '%s' doesn't support 
> secondary split",
>           attno + 1, RelationGetRelationName(r));

Should be "for column %d" also, AFAICS, plus '' -> "" and lowercase
"PickSplit" ... but this message isn't translatable anyway as an elog().
        regards, tom lane