Neil Conway <nconway@klamath.dyndns.org> writes:
> C's information hiding is weak enough that you need to rely on the
> client programmer to exercise good judgement anyway;
This is not a good argument for making the hiding even weaker. I still
object to this patch.
It would be interesting to try to understand *why* BufferGetBlockNumber
is showing up so high in your profile; AFAICS it is not called in any
paths where it'd be a bottleneck --- ie, there is other much more
expensive stuff in the same code paths. Do you have call counts by
caller? What exactly was the test case, anyway?
regards, tom lane