Marc Munro <marc@bloodnok.com> writes:
> On Wed, 2007-02-05 at 08:27 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> The question was rhetorical ... there is no list of "certified sane but
>> unapplied" patches. You are proceeding on the basis of a faulty
>> understanding of how our processes work.
> Why do we need to know the patch is sane? If it does not apply cleanly
> or causes regression tests to fail, the process would figure that out
> quickly and cheaply. There is little cost in attempting to apply a
> non-sane patch.
Unless it contains a trojan horse. I don't think many buildfarm owners
are running the tests inside a sandbox so tight that they don't care
how nasty the code that runs there might be.
regards, tom lane