Re: Spinlock performance improvement proposal

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Giles Lean
Тема Re: Spinlock performance improvement proposal
Дата
Msg-id 19555.1001973430@nemeton.com.au
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Spinlock performance improvement proposal  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> wrote:

> From postmaster startup, by default, could we try larger amounts of
> buffer memory until it fails then back off and allocate that?  Seems
> like a nice default to me.

So performance would vary depending on the amount of shared memory
that could be allocated at startup?  Not a good idea IMHO.

Regards,

Giles



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: cvs problem
Следующее
От: Thomas Lockhart
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: iscachable settings for datetime functions