Re: [PATCHES] SGML index build fix

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [PATCHES] SGML index build fix
Дата
Msg-id 19552.1168221814@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [PATCHES] SGML index build fix  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Ответы Re: [PATCHES] SGML index build fix  (Gavin Sherry <swm@linuxworld.com.au>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Perhaps even more to the point, what makes you think that someone
>> will notice the warning?  If the docs build is one step in an
>> automated build process, this seems unlikely.

> Taking a closer look, it's pretty much guaranteed that no one will see
> them, because the targets they are attached to are intermediate,
> normally followed by latex runs.

If we think this is a problem, ISTM the correct answer is to just force
a repeat jade run when doing "make all".  The only objection to that
AFAICS is that when you're doing docs work and only need a draft to
look at, you'd rather it not run twice.  But perhaps we could address
that by providing a separate target, "make draft" say, that runs jade
but once.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: proposal: catch warnings
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Full page writes