Re: BUG #18817: Security Bug Report: Plaintext Password Exposure in Logs
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #18817: Security Bug Report: Plaintext Password Exposure in Logs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1951016.1739946618@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #18817: Security Bug Report: Plaintext Password Exposure in Logs (Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #18817: Security Bug Report: Plaintext Password Exposure in Logs
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de> writes: > What do I have to configure in the PostgreSQL server to get this > reproduced? I tried: [ scratches head... ] Seems like you must be looking in the wrong log file. It works for me: $ psql postgres psql (18devel) Type "help" for help. postgres=# set log_statement = 'all'; SET postgres=# CREATE USER bla WITH PASSWORD 'bla'; CREATE ROLE postgres=# \q $ tail .../postmaster.log ... 2025-02-19 01:19:18.638 EST [1949443] LOG: statement: CREATE USER bla WITH PASSWORD 'bla'; If you're not running with log_statement = all, the most likely scenario is a syntax error: $ psql postgres psql (18devel) Type "help" for help. postgres=# CREATE USER bla WITH PASWORD 'bla'; ERROR: unrecognized role option "pasword" LINE 1: CREATE USER bla WITH PASWORD 'bla'; ^ postgres=# \q $ tail .../postmaster.log ... 2025-02-19 01:25:39.227 EST [1950440] ERROR: unrecognized role option "pasword" at character 22 2025-02-19 01:25:39.227 EST [1950440] STATEMENT: CREATE USER bla WITH PASWORD 'bla'; Of course, this command didn't do anything; but a person reading the log would have a pretty strong clue what password you were about to assign. (And contrarily, Postgres itself would have no clue that 'bla' might be something that needs hiding.) regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: