Re: pg_control is missing a field for LOBLKSIZE

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: pg_control is missing a field for LOBLKSIZE
Дата
Msg-id 19478.1403046736@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pg_control is missing a field for LOBLKSIZE  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Ответы Re: pg_control is missing a field for LOBLKSIZE
Список pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 03:55:02PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Can't you compare it to the historic default value?  I mean, add an
>> assumption that people thus far has never tweaked it.

> Well, if they did tweak it, then they would be unable to use pg_upgrade
> because it would complain about a mismatch if they actually matched the
> old and new servers.

What about comparing to the symbolic value LOBLKSIZE?  This would make
pg_upgrade assume that the old installation had been tweaked the same
as in its own build.  This ends up being the same as what you said,
ie, effectively no comparison ... but it might be less complicated to
code/understand.
        regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Atomics hardware support table & supported architectures
Следующее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: comparison operators