Re: Concurrent psql patch

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Concurrent psql patch
Дата
Msg-id 19434.1180033474@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Concurrent psql patch  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Ответы Re: Concurrent psql patch  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Список pgsql-patches
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> If we're going to include libpq-int.h maybe we need to put it in
> common.h. Is there a reason that our own client programs shouldn't use
> our own library internals?

Seems like a really bad idea to me.  I know I've cursed mysql more than
once for doing the equivalent.  Also, if psql needs more than is
currently exported as official API, why wouldn't other programs need it
too?  If there's more needed here, let's see an official API change,
not a hack.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Concurrent psql patch
Следующее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Concurrent psql patch