Re: Lots of incorrect comments in nodeFuncs.c

David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> writes:
> hmm ok.  I imagine there must be a better way to say that then since
> it confused at least 1 reader so far.  My problem is that I assumed
> "result" meant the result of the function that the comment is written
> in, not the result of evaluating the given expression during
> execution. If that was more clear then I'd not have been misled.

Maybe like

                case T_ScalarArrayOpExpr:
                    /* ScalarArrayOpExpr's result is boolean ... */
                    coll = InvalidOid;      /* ... so it has no collation */
                    break;

?

            regards, tom lane