Re: archive_command failures report confusing exit status

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Better patch.

Doesn't this patch break the behavior that is documented in the comment?
Specifically, the case where the restore_command dies on a signal and
this is reported to us by the controlling shell as exitcode > 128.
We want the archiver to die, but this patch makes it not do so.
        regards, tom lane