Re: BUG #3723: dropping an index that doesn't refer to table's columns

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: BUG #3723: dropping an index that doesn't refer to table's columns
Дата
Msg-id 19344.1194361243@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: BUG #3723: dropping an index that doesn't refer to table's columns  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com>)
Ответы Re: BUG #3723: dropping an index that doesn't refer to table's columns  (Sam Mason <sam@samason.me.uk>)
Список pgsql-bugs
Дерево обсуждения 
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Please explain how you thought it would help you do that, because
>> without some evidence that there's a use-case, I'm inclined to fix it
>> as above ...

> Note that it was a unique index:

Missed that --- obviously need more caffeine ...

> Not sure that's enough of a use case to justify not banning it...

Yeah, it probably is.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Heikki Linnakangas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #3723: dropping an index that doesn't refer to table's columns
Следующее
От: Sam Mason
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #3723: dropping an index that doesn't refer to table's columns