Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 19337.1115269700@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Kind of offtopic but at that point should we also include plJava?
Not decided, but it's surely on the radar screen for this discussion.
Joe Conway's PL/R is in the back of my mind as well --- it likely has
a smaller userbase than the first two, but from a maintenance standpoint
it probably belongs on the same level.
> Should we put plPHP in contrib/plphp? With its own build options?
Not under contrib either: it's got to be a separate source tree.
I grow a bit weary and am not seeing exactly how this maps to a CVS
setup... do we need more than one CVS module?
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: