Re: Psql regex is NFA or DFA?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Psql regex is NFA or DFA?
Дата
Msg-id 19291.1031667213@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Psql regex is NFA or DFA?  (Josh Jore <josh@greentechnologist.org>)
Ответы Re: Psql regex is NFA or DFA?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-general
Josh Jore <josh@greentechnologist.org> writes:
> So I've finished reading Jeffery Friedl's _Mastering Regular Expressions_
> and while I don't need regex in PostgreSQL I know I'll do it for something
> - eventually. The book makes a distinction between DFA, POSIX NFA and
> Traditional NFA and then ascribes some properties and behaviours to each.
> So what sort does PostgreSQL have?

Well, you could read the code (src/backend/regex), or you could apply
the tests that Friedl suggests to distinguish the type of an unknown
engine ...

My guess is that it's an NFA, but I dunno if Spencer did the POSIX
semantics or not.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: nextval result type difference between 7.1.3 and 7.2.1
Следующее
От: "v.nrg"
Дата:
Сообщение: statement triggers