Re: Estimation error in n_dead_tuples
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Estimation error in n_dead_tuples |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 19286.1170349051@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Estimation error in n_dead_tuples (ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Estimation error in n_dead_tuples
Re: Estimation error in n_dead_tuples |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp> writes:
> I'm thinking to add "the number of vacuumed tuples" to the message from
> vacuum. The stats collector will subtract the value from n_dead_tuples
> instead of setting it to zero. This is also needed if we want to make
> some kinds of "partial" vacuum methods.
This seems awfully dangerous to me, because then you are operating on
dead reckoning forever: there will be nothing that can correct an
inaccurate rowcount estimate, and in practice that means it will diverge
arbitrarily far from reality :-(, because of the inherent inaccuracies
of the stats system. I think the risk of that is far worse than the
relatively small (or at least bounded) error arising from tuples not
seen by vacuum.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: