Re: [HACKERS] parallelize queries containing initplans
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] parallelize queries containing initplans |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 19264.1510675214@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] parallelize queries containing initplans (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] parallelize queries containing initplans
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 12:00 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Am I missing something? Do you have some test or shape of the plan in
>> mind which can cause a problem?
> The problem would happen if the plan for InitPlan $1 in the above
> example itself referenced a parameter from an upper query level, and
> the value of that parameter changed, and then this section of the plan
> tree was rescanned. I'm not sure I can write a query like that
> off-hand, but I think it's possible to do so.
Yeah, I'm sure it is. I have a vague recollection that there might be
existing regression test cases exercising such things, though I won't
swear to that. The "orderstest" bit in subselect.sql looks like it
might be meant to do that...
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: