Re: Avoid full GIN index scan when possible
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Avoid full GIN index scan when possible |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 19189.1564687723@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Avoid full GIN index scan when possible (Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Avoid full GIN index scan when possible
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru> writes:
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 9:59 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> While I've not attempted to fix that here, I wonder whether we shouldn't
>> fix it by just forcing forcedRecheck to true in any case where we discard
>> an ALL qualifier.
> +1 for setting forcedRecheck in any case we discard ALL qualifier.
> ISTM, real life number of cases we can skip recheck here is
> negligible. And it doesn't justify complexity.
Yeah, that was pretty much what I was thinking --- by the time we got
it fully right considering nulls and multicolumn indexes, the cases
where not rechecking could actually do something useful would be
pretty narrow. And a bitmap heap scan is always going to have to
visit the heap, IIRC, so how much could skipping the recheck really
save?
>> BTW, it's not particularly the fault of this patch, but: what does it
>> even mean to specify GIN_SEARCH_MODE_ALL with a nonzero number of keys?
> It might mean we would like to see all the results, which don't
> contain given key.
Ah, right, I forgot that the consistent-fn might look at the match
results.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: