Re: POC: GROUP BY optimization

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tomas Vondra
Тема Re: POC: GROUP BY optimization
Дата
Msg-id 1913e082-0d8d-5eb8-c8ca-053af828076a@2ndquadrant.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: POC: GROUP BY optimization  (Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>)
Ответы Re: POC: GROUP BY optimization  (Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>)
Список pgsql-hackers

On 06/28/2018 06:52 PM, Teodor Sigaev wrote:
>> I'm afraid that's a misunderstanding - my objections did not really go
>> away. I'm just saying my claim that we're not messing with order of
>> grouping keys is not entirely accurate, because we do that in one
>> particular case.
>>
>> I still think we need to be careful when introducing new optimizations
>> in this area - reordering the grouping keys by ndistinct, ORDER BY or
>> whatever. In particular I don't think we should commit these patches
>> that may quite easily cause regressions, and then hope some hypothetical
>> future patch fixes the costing. Those objections still stand.
> 
> Pls, have a look at https://commitfest.postgresql.org/18/1706/
> I tried to attack the cost_sort() issues and hope on that basis we can 
> solve problems with 0002 patch and improve incremental sort patch.
> 

OK, will do. Thanks for working on this!

regards

-- 
Tomas Vondra                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tomas Vondra
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Remove mention in docs that foreign keys on partitioned tablesare not supported
Следующее
От: Konstantin Knizhnik
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Monitoring time of fsyncing WALs