Re: Extended protocol logging

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Extended protocol logging
Дата
Msg-id 19138.1162393609@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Extended protocol logging  ("Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
"Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 23:51 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> With what logging settings?  log_duration has rather different behavior
>> from what it used to do.

> I think it would be useful to have the log results from a test program
> in the protocol section,

The contents of the postmaster log are surely not part of the FE protocol.
Clients can't even see the log without resorting to nonstandard hacks.

What it sounds like to me is that Dave's client has got log_duration = ON
when what he should have is log_min_duration_statement = 0.  Those two
settings used to be just about redundant but as of 8.2 they have got
distinct functionality.  See this thread:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-09/msg00681.php
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: imad
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: ¿¿¿past chunk end???
Следующее
От: Martijn van Oosterhout
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: ¿¿¿pas