Re: compiling pg 7.0.3 on sco 5.0.5
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: compiling pg 7.0.3 on sco 5.0.5 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1910.975909630@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: compiling pg 7.0.3 on sco 5.0.5 ("Billy G. Allie" <bga@mug.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: compiling pg 7.0.3 on sco 5.0.5
Re: compiling pg 7.0.3 on sco 5.0.5 |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Billy G. Allie" <bga@mug.org> writes:
> ... The DISABLE_COMPLEX_MACRO definition was originally put in to work
> around a macro size limitation of the UnixWare 2.1 C compiler (and
> later the SCO UDK (Universal Development Kit)). If the gnu C compiler
> is being used it should not be defined.
Hm. Is anyone likely to still be using a version of that compiler that
still has such limitations?
I ask because we recently pulled "#define DISABLE_COMPLEX_MACRO" from
port/sco.h, on the grounds that various people were seeing more harm
than good from it. But I'm suddenly wondering whether those people
might've been using gcc. I wonder if
#ifndef __GNUC__#define DISABLE_COMPLEX_MACRO#endif
in port/sco.h would be the smart way to go.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: