Re: bit string functions

Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> "Andrew Sullivan" <ajs@crankycanuck.ca> writes:
>> I would say just set up a project on pgfoundry. 

> I agree, though I think in the long term we do need a more complete set of
> operators and functions in core.

Considering that BIT and BIT VARYING have been removed entirely from
SQL:2003, it seems unlikely to me that we should expend our limited
resources in that particular direction.
        regards, tom lane