Re: [HACKERS] CTE inlining

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [HACKERS] CTE inlining
Дата
Msg-id 19072.1493526526@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] CTE inlining  (Craig Ringer <craig.ringer@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] CTE inlining
Re: [HACKERS] CTE inlining
Re: [HACKERS] CTE inlining
Re: [HACKERS] CTE inlining
Список pgsql-hackers
Craig Ringer <craig.ringer@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> - as you noted, it is hard to decide when it's worth inlining vs
> materializing for CTE terms referenced more than once.

[ raised eyebrow... ]  Please explain why the answer isn't trivially
"never".

There's already a pretty large hill to climb here in the way of
breaking peoples' expectations about CTEs being optimization
fences.  Breaking the documented semantics about CTEs being
single-evaluation seems to me to be an absolute non-starter.
        regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Craig Ringer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] CTE inlining
Следующее
От: Pavel Stehule
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] CTE inlining