Re: impossible to update rows specifying columns with NULL
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: impossible to update rows specifying columns with NULL |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 19062.1109700228@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: impossible to update rows specifying columns with NULL (Guillaume Cottenceau <gc@mnc.ch>) |
| Ответы |
Re: impossible to update rows specifying columns with NULL
|
| Список | pgsql-jdbc |
Guillaume Cottenceau <gc@mnc.ch> writes:
> Markus Schaber <schabios 'at' logi-track.com> writes:
>> You don't have to do this globally, you can also issue
>> set transform_null_equals to true;
>> as statement so this setting is only for your connection.
> In the doc pointed by Oliver I can read that this NULL != NULL
> behaviour is per SQL standard, so I'm unsure if I should go the
> way of forcing the non standard behaviour..
I don't think it will help you anyway. That kluge only deals with
the literal syntax "something = NULL" where the NULL is written out
as the keyword NULL. You appear to be wishing that "something = $n"
would be treated as "something IS NULL" if the parameter $n happened
to have the value NULL, and that most definitely isn't going to happen.
A workaround in recent PG versions is to use "IS DISTINCT FROM", which
is a version of != that works the way you want with nulls. However this
is guaranteed not to be indexable so I don't know how useful it is in
real-world cases.
In my mind, if you are up against this it suggests that you are misusing
NULL as a "real" data value, which is going to be a big headache given
the SQL sematics for NULL. You ought to rethink your data
representation.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: