Re: BUG #3002: PQexecParams only supports some commands; needs improved error reporting, documenting or fixing
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: BUG #3002: PQexecParams only supports some commands; needs improved error reporting, documenting or fixing |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 19059.1171438759@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | BUG #3002: PQexecParams only supports some commands; needs improved error reporting, documenting or fixing ("Phil Endecott" <spam_from_postgresql_bugs@chezphil.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: BUG #3002: PQexecParams only supports some commands;
needs improved error reporting, documenting or fixing
|
| Список | pgsql-bugs |
"Phil Endecott" <spam_from_postgresql_bugs@chezphil.org> writes:
> I understand that PQexecParams may only be used for SELECT, INSERT, DELETE
> and UPDATE commands, but not for other commands where parameter substitution
> might be useful such as CREATE VIEW and CREATE TABLE AS SELECT. When I used
> PQexecParams with CREATE VIEW with one $ parameter I got no error
> immediately, but got a "no value found for parameter 1" error when I later
> ran a query that used the view.
As near as I can tell, your issue is that you haven't thought carefully
about what "$1" in a CREATE VIEW *means*. Is it supposed to represent a
constant value bound into the view when it's created? Is it supposed to
represent a value supplied whenever the view is used (if so, how do you
disambiguate when the query calling the view uses $1 for its own
purposes?). Or something else?
Given defensible arguments for a particular answer to these definitional
questions, we might think about implementing something, but right now my
instinct is to not go there. I'm not seeing a use-case that would
justify work on this.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: