Re: PostgreSQL and mySQL database size question
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: PostgreSQL and mySQL database size question |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 19044.988658251@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | RE: PostgreSQL and mySQL database size question ("Fred Ingham" <ingham@erols.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
"Fred Ingham" <ingham@erols.com> writes:
> After dropping and recreating the indexes I have (in KB):
Ah, that's more like it.
> So, it appears that I am running into the pathological case.
Actually, a simpler explanation would be if you'd done a bunch of
updates and/or deletes at some point. VACUUM currently never shrinks
indexes, so the excess index space might just represent the peak size
of your tables. (Yes, improving that is on the to-do list.)
> In short, they are all needed for acceptable performance querying and
> retrieving values from the database.
You've got common queries that do selects with WHERE clauses referencing
each one of these columns? Possible, certainly, but seems a bit odd...
> With respect to mySQL, I did verify that mySQL did in fact have all of the
> indexes I created and that they were saved in a single file (the *.MYI).
Hm. Anyone know how mySQL represents indexes? That still seems awfully
small.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: