BUG #19023: Table DDL default column expression depending on temp objects
От | PG Bug reporting form |
---|---|
Тема | BUG #19023: Table DDL default column expression depending on temp objects |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 19023-0a5a85a44ec3f0c6@postgresql.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #19023: Table DDL default column expression depending on temp objects
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
The following bug has been logged on the website: Bug reference: 19023 Logged by: Kirill Reshke Email address: reshkekirill@gmail.com PostgreSQL version: 18beta3 Operating system: any Description: I have found two cases when user can define a relation, which has temp objects in its DEFAULT expression. First example is: ``` reshke=# create temp sequence s1; CREATE SEQUENCE reshke=# create table tt(i int default nextval('s1')); CREATE TABLE ``` I think it is a bug that PostgreSQL allows this DDL to successfully complete. There is a validation for this type of DDL already, example: ``` reshke=# create table ttx(i int default nextval('s3')); ERROR: relation "s3" does not exist LINE 1: create table ttx(i int default nextval('s3')); ^ ``` Since PostgreSQL already checks for its nextval() input, we can teach server to also validate relation relpersistence, arent we? Second example is with tables: ``` reshke=# create temp table x(); CREATE TABLE reshke=# create table y (i int default nextval('x')); CREATE TABLE reshke=# insert into y default values ; ERROR: cannot open relation "x" DETAIL: This operation is not supported for tables. ``` WDYT? Is this indeed a bug?
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: