Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com> writes:
> On 24-Jul-05, at 7:41 PM, Oliver Jowett wrote:
>> I'm leaning towards using UNKNOWN as the least-bad option for now,
> Seems like this is the only way to go for now. +1 from me.
I haven't got a better idea either. Seems like we should cobble this up
and see how badly it fails, at least ;-)
regards, tom lane