Re: Aggregate function API versus grouping sets
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Aggregate function API versus grouping sets |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 18963.1404326824@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Aggregate function API versus grouping sets (Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Aggregate function API versus grouping sets
Re: Aggregate function API versus grouping sets |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk> writes:
> "Tom" == Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
> Tom> Another approach would be to remove AggGetPerAggEContext as such
> Tom> from the API altogether, and instead offer an interface that
> Tom> says "register an aggregate cleanup callback", leaving it to the
> Tom> agg/window core code to figure out which context to hang that
> Tom> on. I had thought that exposing this econtext and the
> Tom> per-input-tuple one would provide useful generality, but maybe
> Tom> we should rethink that.
> Works for me.
If we're going to do that, I think it needs to be in 9.4. Are you
going to work up a patch?
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: