Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> writes:
> On 10/11/2025 17:16, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think the number this should have bumped is PG_CONTROL_VERSION
>> (thanks to the new field therein). Bumping CATALOG_VERSION_NO
>> seems quite beside the point.
> Ah thanks, I forgot we have that as a separate version number. I'll go
> bump that now. (I will not try to revert the CATALOG_VERSION_NO change,
> that would be very confusing.)
Agreed, undoing it would accomplish nothing good.
regards, tom lane