Re: [HACKERS] Bug

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Bug
Дата
Msg-id 18882.943928929@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Bug  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> It appears this bug still exists.

Yes.  I think this cannot be fixed without having a two-level querytree
structure for INSERT ... SELECT.  The problem is basically that the
DISTINCT processing is happening on the tuples that are ready to put
into the target table (after the 'n' column is added), rather than on
the tuples that are coming out of the source table.  With only one
targetlist there is no way to represent the notion that the DISTINCT
needs to happen on just the 't' column.

This is one of a large number of things waiting for a redesign of
querytrees...
        regards, tom lane

>> ran=> create table test1 (n int default nextval('seq_test'), t text);
>>
>> ran=> insert into test1 ("t") select distinct src from test_source;
>> 
>> ran=> select * from test1;
>> n|t              
>> -+---------------
>> 1|First distinct 
>> 2|First distinct 
>> 3|Second distinct
>> 4|Second distinct
>> (4 rows)


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Tricky query, tricky response
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] union and LIMIT problem