Re: idea for concurrent seqscans

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: idea for concurrent seqscans
Дата
Msg-id 18864.1109393500@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: idea for concurrent seqscans  ("Jim C. Nasby" <decibel@decibel.org>)
Ответы Re: idea for concurrent seqscans  ("Jim C. Nasby" <decibel@decibel.org>)
Re: idea for concurrent seqscans  ("Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
"Jim C. Nasby" <decibel@decibel.org> writes:
>> but I also hate to burden the developers with rewriting a lot of
>> regression tests when their time could be better spent elsewhere.

> Certainly, but I suspect it's just a matter of adding ORDER BY to
> everything, which just about anyone (even myself!) should be able to do.

Performance is not the issue; test coverage, however, is an issue.
See the comment at the end of
http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/regress-evaluation.html#AEN22383
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jeff Hoffmann
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Development Plans
Следующее
От: "Jim C. Nasby"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: idea for concurrent seqscans