Hi Vitalii,
On Friday 22 of January 2016 00:39:17 Vitalii Tymchyshyn wrote:
> I did some research. The OSGi dependencies can be replaced to the OSS ones:
> osgi-core to org.apache.felix:osgi-core:1.4.0 that is already in Fedora
> osge-enterprise to org.ops4j.pax.jdbc:pax-jdbc-spec:0.6.0. This one is not
> there, but other OPS4J packages are in there, so I presume this one can be
> added too. Please confirm.
Let me check please, OSS alternative is definitely better! But if we
could make this optional build/runtime dependancy, that would be better.
Pavel
> The only change other than dependency needed is due to a little older spec
> used:
>
> Index: pgjdbc/src/main/java/org/postgresql/osgi/PGBundleActivator.java
> IDEA additional info:
> Subsystem: com.intellij.openapi.diff.impl.patch.CharsetEP
> <+>UTF-8
> ===================================================================
> --- pgjdbc/src/main/java/org/postgresql/osgi/PGBundleActivator.java
> (revision 0f979c3bbe1a36e6614e3d448ea43de7be27448b)
> +++ pgjdbc/src/main/java/org/postgresql/osgi/PGBundleActivator.java
> (revision )
> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
> * This class is an OSGi Bundle Activator and should only be used
> internally by the OSGi Framework
> */
> public class PGBundleActivator implements BundleActivator {
> - private ServiceRegistration<?> _registration;
> + private ServiceRegistration _registration;
>
> public void start(BundleContext context) throws Exception {
> Dictionary<String, Object> properties = new Hashtable<String, Object>();
>
>
>
> Чт, 21 січ. 2016 о 17:41 Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com> пише:
>
> > Yes, Alvaro found one that should work
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/OSGiGuidelines, although I
> > don't see a ubuntu one
> >
> > Dave Cramer
> >
> > davec@postgresintl.com
> > www.postgresintl.com
> >
> > On 21 January 2016 at 17:04, Vladimir Sitnikov <
> > sitnikov.vladimir@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> >So it seems like one solution to osgi is just to copy the sources into
> >> the project. These are all interfaces, and a minimal number of files, I
> >> think around 4
> >>
> >> What's the problem with packaging OSGi interfaces as usual rpms (or
> >> whatever is used for packaging)?
> >> As for me, "copy&pasting <<minimal number of files, I think around
> >> 4>>" does not solve legal issues if there are any.
> >> On top of that, exposing OSGi interfaces as part of pgjdbc.jar would
> >> probably void OSGi compliance. The jar would just not load due to
> >> invalid contents.
> >>
> >> Vladimir
> >>
> >
> >