Re: Does pg_dump ignore indexes?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Does pg_dump ignore indexes? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1885.974825626@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Does pg_dump ignore indexes? ("Vilson farias" <vilson.farias@digitro.com.br>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
"Vilson farias" <vilson.farias@digitro.com.br> writes: > Check this out : > [postgres@dgtao backup]$ /usr/bin/vacuumdb --analyze --verbose -d relatorio > NOTICE: --Relation pg_type-- > NOTICE: Pages 4: Changed 0, reaped 1, Empty 0, New 0; Tup 274: Vac 0, > Keep/VTL 0/0, Crash 0, UnUsed 10, MinLen 105, MaxLen 114; Re-using: > Free/Avail. Space 1180/0; EndEmpty/Avail. Pages 0/0. CPU 0.00s/0.03u sec. > NOTICE: Index pg_type_typname_index: Pages 10; Tuples 274: Deleted 0. CPU > 0.02s/0.01u sec. > NOTICE: Index pg_type_oid_index: Pages 5; Tuples 274: Deleted 0. CPU > 0.00s/0.01u sec. > ... lots of... > NOTICE: --Relation cham_chamada-- > NOTICE: Rel cham_chamada: TID 4/1: OID IS INVALID. TUPGONE 1. > NOTICE: Rel cham_chamada: TID 4/2: OID IS INVALID. TUPGONE 1. > ....3 to 56... > NOTICE: Rel cham_chamada: TID 4/57: OID IS INVALID. TUPGONE 1. > NOTICE: Rel cham_chamada: TID 4/58: OID IS INVALID. TUPGONE 1. > pqReadData() -- backend closed the channel unexpectedly. Looks like you've got some corrupted data in that table :-(. If you have a backup, you should restore this table from backup. Or you could try dumping just this table (pg_dump -t cham_chamada relatorio). If the results look correct, drop the table and reload it from the dump. If you are running a Postgres version earlier than 7.0.3, I'd strongly advise updating to 7.0.3 ASAP. There are several critical fixes in 7.0.3, including one for a VACUUM problem that might cause this sort of corruption, depending on what your update patterns are like. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: