Re: Postgres and TLSv1.2

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Postgres and TLSv1.2
Дата
Msg-id 18843.1432255527@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Postgres and TLSv1.2  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Postgres and TLSv1.2  (Jan Bilek <jan.bilek@eftlab.co.uk>)
Список pgsql-hackers
I wrote:
> I think this was probably a mistake.  I suggest that in the back branches
> we should leave the server alone (rejecting SSL v3 might annoy somebody
> using old non-libpq clients) but adjust libpq to use SSLv23_method() plus
> SSL_OP_NO_SSLv2 | SSL_OP_NO_SSLv3.  IOW, back-patch 820f08cabdcbb899,
> though perhaps also the comment adjustments in 326e1d73c476a0b5.
> This would have the effect of allowing libpq to use TLS-anything, not only
> TLSv1 which is what it's been requiring since 7.3.2.

Done at
http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=c6b7b9a9cef1253ad12122959d0e78f62d8aee1f

This is too late for tomorrow's releases, but it will be in the next minor
releases --- or if you're in a hurry, you could apply that patch locally.
        regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: GiST KNN Crasher
Следующее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add support for INSERT ... ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING/UPDATE.