Re: How to prevent duplicate key error when two processes do DELETE/INSERT simultaneously?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: How to prevent duplicate key error when two processes do DELETE/INSERT simultaneously? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 18823.1248880981@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | How to prevent duplicate key error when two processes do DELETE/INSERT simultaneously? (Brodie Thiesfield <brofield+pgsql@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: How to prevent duplicate key error when two processes
do DELETE/INSERT simultaneously?
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
Brodie Thiesfield <brofield+pgsql@gmail.com> writes:
> Essentially, I have two processes connecting to a single PG database
> and simultaneously issuing the following statements:
> BEGIN;
> SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL SERIALIZABLE;
> DELETE FROM licence_properties WHERE key = xxx;
> INSERT INTO licence_properties ... values with key = xxx;
> COMMIT
You mean they both want to insert the same key?
> One of these processes is getting to the INSERT and failing with
> duplicate key error.
> ERROR: duplicate key value violates unique constraint
If they both insert the same key, this is what *must* happen. Surely
you don't expect both to succeed, or one to fail and not tell you.
> The DELETE should prevent this duplicate key error from occurring. I
> thought that the ISOLATION LEVEL SERIALIZABLE would fix this problem
> (being that the second process can see the INSERT from the first
> process after it has done the DELETE), but it doesn't.
I think you've got the effects of SERIALIZABLE backward, but in any
case SERIALIZABLE does not affect uniqueness checks. Unique is unique.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: